Comparação
Procurando uma alternativa ao Fathom?
A meeting notetaker offering both a bot and a bot-free desktop capture mode.
Cada preço e recurso abaixo foi verificado em 2026-08-09 na fonte indicada ao lado. As coisas mudam — avise-nos se algo aqui estiver desatualizado.
Quando o Fathom é a melhor escolha
- An unlimited free tier that is shipping today and has been for years, where ours is unlimited but pre-launch. Free and available beats free and promised.
- Outstanding user satisfaction: 5.0 on G2 across thousands of reviews.
- A choice of bot or bot-free capture, per meeting.
Onde somos diferentes
- Android.
- Training is off by default rather than opt-out.
- Cross-language meetings.
- Transcription runs on your own device and the audio is never uploaded — Fathom's free tier is unlimited too, but the recording still goes to their servers.
Lado a lado
| Fathom | Nós | |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | macOS, Windows and web. No Android app.fathom.ai · verificado em 2026-08-09 | The web app and installable PWA, on desktop and phone browsers. A macOS client and an iOS/Android app exist in source but are not distributed. |
| Price | Premium at $20/month, or $16 billed annually.fathom.ai/pricing · verificado em 2026-08-09 | An unlimited free tier, then Pro $15/month ($12/month billed annually) for the parts that need a server. No Team or Enterprise plan. The pricing page says whether checkout is open. |
| Free tier | Unlimited recording and transcription.fathom.ai/pricing · verificado em 2026-08-09 | — |
| Model training | Uses de-identified customer data to improve its own models, with an opt-out in settings.Fathom security documentation · verificado em 2026-08-09 | Off unless you turn it on. |
O que não fazemos
- We launched in September 2026. The web app and installable PWA are live and you can use them now; every product we compare against has years of production history and we have days. There is no independent track record to check yet.
- No diarization. No engine we use separates speakers, we do not store voiceprints as a matter of policy, and speaker names are typed by the user. Wispr pulls real names off the calendar invite; on this one they are simply better and it is the most visible thing we lack.
- No system-wide dictation you can install today. Dictate works inside the browser tab and installed app, and you copy or share the result; the macOS client that types where your cursor is exists in source but is not distributed. Wispr Flow types into any app on four platforms.
- No native app is distributed. The product is a web app and an installable PWA; the macOS scaffold compiles but ships to nobody. On-device transcription therefore needs a browser with WebGPU or WASM rather than a Mac, which is a wider net than it sounds, but it is not a native app.
- On-device transcription costs a one-time model download before the first meeting, and runs slower on a weak machine than a datacentre GPU would. That is the trade we are making for never uploading your audio; we state it rather than hiding it.
- Newer and smaller than every product on this page, with no track record to point at.
Experimente em uma reunião
Grave sua próxima chamada com as duas ferramentas e compare as transcrições. É a única comparação que decide alguma coisa.
Abrir o app